<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 197 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, finding that the penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) lacked specificity and the imposition of penalty based on estimated income was unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the penalty for all the assessment years in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 07:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 197 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, finding that the penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) lacked specificity and the imposition of penalty based on estimated income was unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the penalty for all the assessment years in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>