<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 191 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377747</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed both appeals, overturning the denial of exemption under section 10A and the confirmation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal emphasized that the deduction under section 10A should be calculated independently before adjusting any brought forward losses and concluded that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not justified as there was no deliberate default on the part of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 191 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377747</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed both appeals, overturning the denial of exemption under section 10A and the confirmation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal emphasized that the deduction under section 10A should be calculated independently before adjusting any brought forward losses and concluded that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not justified as there was no deliberate default on the part of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>