<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 74 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17536</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ applications, ruling that the activities performed by the petitioners on kendu leaves did not amount to &quot;processing&quot; under the proviso to Section 206C(1) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, tax collection at source applied, and the petitioners were denied exemption certificates under Rule 37C. The Government of India&#039;s decision from January 10, 1996, regarding the applicability of Section 206C(1) to kendu leaves traders was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 74 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17536</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ applications, ruling that the activities performed by the petitioners on kendu leaves did not amount to &quot;processing&quot; under the proviso to Section 206C(1) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, tax collection at source applied, and the petitioners were denied exemption certificates under Rule 37C. The Government of India&#039;s decision from January 10, 1996, regarding the applicability of Section 206C(1) to kendu leaves traders was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>