https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377744 The appeal of the co-noticee acting as an interpreter was allowed as she was found not directly involved in illegal activities. However, the appeals of the three appellants involved in dealing with smuggled diamonds were partly allowed, with their penalties under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 being reduced from Rs. 5 Lakhs each to Rs. 50,000 each due to the extent of their involvement. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377744 The appeal of the co-noticee acting as an interpreter was allowed as she was found not directly involved in illegal activities. However, the appeals of the three appellants involved in dealing with smuggled diamonds were partly allowed, with their penalties under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 being reduced from Rs. 5 Lakhs each to Rs. 50,000 each due to the extent of their involvement. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377744