<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 171 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377727</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed by the Tribunal, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for determining the liability of interest on the differential duty paid post-revision of prices based on the pending reference before the Larger Bench of the Supreme Court. This decision was influenced by doubts raised over the precedent set by the SKF India Ltd case, leading to a reconsideration of the matter in light of subsequent Division Bench rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 06:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 171 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377727</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed by the Tribunal, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for determining the liability of interest on the differential duty paid post-revision of prices based on the pending reference before the Larger Bench of the Supreme Court. This decision was influenced by doubts raised over the precedent set by the SKF India Ltd case, leading to a reconsideration of the matter in light of subsequent Division Bench rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>