https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377724 The Tribunal remanded the case for further adjudication, finding merit in the appellant's argument that duty had already been paid by the sister unit for the windshields manufactured by the appellants. The Tribunal noted that crucial information regarding job work under Notification No. 214/86 was not presented during the initial proceedings, ordering a remand to allow the appellants to provide necessary evidence and documents. The appeal was allowed for re-adjudication by the adjudicating authority. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2019 06:24:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377724 The Tribunal remanded the case for further adjudication, finding merit in the appellant's argument that duty had already been paid by the sister unit for the windshields manufactured by the appellants. The Tribunal noted that crucial information regarding job work under Notification No. 214/86 was not presented during the initial proceedings, ordering a remand to allow the appellants to provide necessary evidence and documents. The appeal was allowed for re-adjudication by the adjudicating authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377724