<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 167 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications for rectification of mistake, directing the appellant&#039;s counsel to provide a copy of the written submissions to the Learned Authorized Representative and include them in the court record. The matter was scheduled for reconsideration to ensure the correct facts were recorded before a decision could be made, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant submissions to avoid mistakes on record and uphold natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 167 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications for rectification of mistake, directing the appellant&#039;s counsel to provide a copy of the written submissions to the Learned Authorized Representative and include them in the court record. The matter was scheduled for reconsideration to ensure the correct facts were recorded before a decision could be made, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant submissions to avoid mistakes on record and uphold natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>