https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377716 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the demand for duty was not sustainable as the activity of re-packing parts did not meet the conditions of manufacturing under Section 2(f)(iii) of the Central Excise Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any necessary consequential relief. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2019 06:13:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377716 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the demand for duty was not sustainable as the activity of re-packing parts did not meet the conditions of manufacturing under Section 2(f)(iii) of the Central Excise Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any necessary consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377716