<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 154 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377710</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and restored the appellant&#039;s acquittal. The appellant successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rendering his defense probable. The Court criticized the High Court for lacking an appreciation of evidence and valid reasons to overturn the first appellate court&#039;s findings, ultimately justifying the order of acquittal by the first appellate court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 154 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377710</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and restored the appellant&#039;s acquittal. The appellant successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rendering his defense probable. The Court criticized the High Court for lacking an appreciation of evidence and valid reasons to overturn the first appellate court&#039;s findings, ultimately justifying the order of acquittal by the first appellate court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>