<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279719</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, related to the clearance of metallurgical coke to a sister unit. The appellants had already reversed credit in compliance with retrospective amendments, rendering the demand unnecessary. The tribunal emphasized the significance of complying with credit reversal requirements, leading to the overturning of the demand and disposal of the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279719</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, related to the clearance of metallurgical coke to a sister unit. The appellants had already reversed credit in compliance with retrospective amendments, rendering the demand unnecessary. The tribunal emphasized the significance of complying with credit reversal requirements, leading to the overturning of the demand and disposal of the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>