https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279725 The court declined to grant a complete stay on the outstanding tax demand, emphasizing the need to assess each case individually. It acknowledged the petitioner's financial constraints due to property attachment but suggested extending the tax payment deadline instead of additional relief. The court scheduled further proceedings to delve into the petitioner's concerns, reflecting a balanced approach towards addressing the challenges posed by the tax demands and property attachment during the ongoing appeal process. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2019 05:57:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279725 The court declined to grant a complete stay on the outstanding tax demand, emphasizing the need to assess each case individually. It acknowledged the petitioner's financial constraints due to property attachment but suggested extending the tax payment deadline instead of additional relief. The court scheduled further proceedings to delve into the petitioner's concerns, reflecting a balanced approach towards addressing the challenges posed by the tax demands and property attachment during the ongoing appeal process. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279725