<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 44 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17528</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to deny registration to the firm, emphasizing the importance of genuine partnership, capital contribution, and adherence to partnership terms for tax benefits. The court placed the burden of proof on the assessee to establish the firm&#039;s genuine existence, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 44 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17528</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to deny registration to the firm, emphasizing the importance of genuine partnership, capital contribution, and adherence to partnership terms for tax benefits. The court placed the burden of proof on the assessee to establish the firm&#039;s genuine existence, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>