https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279714 The court rejected the application to quash the complaint, emphasizing that the applicant, a director, was responsible for the business affairs of the company based on the allegations. The court stressed the need to decide the case on its merits and directed timely disposal of cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act within six months to prevent delays. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:49:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279714 The court rejected the application to quash the complaint, emphasizing that the applicant, a director, was responsible for the business affairs of the company based on the allegations. The court stressed the need to decide the case on its merits and directed timely disposal of cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act within six months to prevent delays. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279714