<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 809 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279710</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the penalty imposed under section 271D for accepting cash deposits in violation of section 269SS. IT found that the transactions were genuine and not loans, involving the same person in different capacities. The ITAT concluded that the penalty was unjustified based on relevant case law and the explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:55:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 809 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279710</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the penalty imposed under section 271D for accepting cash deposits in violation of section 269SS. IT found that the transactions were genuine and not loans, involving the same person in different capacities. The ITAT concluded that the penalty was unjustified based on relevant case law and the explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>