https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377701 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Designated Authority's final findings recommending no imposition of anti-dumping duties on AA Dry Cell Batteries from China and Vietnam. The court upheld the DA's conclusions that the domestic industry was not materially injured, emphasizing the higher selling prices and profits earned by the domestic industry. It reiterated the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 and the Central Government's discretionary power to accept or reject anti-dumping duty recommendations. The court found no procedural irregularity or illegality in the DA's findings and upheld the recommendation against imposing anti-dumping duties. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377701 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Designated Authority's final findings recommending no imposition of anti-dumping duties on AA Dry Cell Batteries from China and Vietnam. The court upheld the DA's conclusions that the domestic industry was not materially injured, emphasizing the higher selling prices and profits earned by the domestic industry. It reiterated the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 and the Central Government's discretionary power to accept or reject anti-dumping duty recommendations. The court found no procedural irregularity or illegality in the DA's findings and upheld the recommendation against imposing anti-dumping duties. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377701