https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377688 The Tribunal upheld the department's decision to disallow CENVAT credit on rental charges of godown and stevedoring services for Custom House Agent and Steamer Agent services. It concluded that these charges were not directly related to the taxable services provided by the appellant and were considered reimbursable expenses. The Tribunal found the appellant in violation of rules, leading to the disallowance of credit, imposition of interest, and penalty for non-compliance under Rule 15(3) of CCR 2004. The appeal was rejected, affirming the lower authorities' decision. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377688 The Tribunal upheld the department's decision to disallow CENVAT credit on rental charges of godown and stevedoring services for Custom House Agent and Steamer Agent services. It concluded that these charges were not directly related to the taxable services provided by the appellant and were considered reimbursable expenses. The Tribunal found the appellant in violation of rules, leading to the disallowance of credit, imposition of interest, and penalty for non-compliance under Rule 15(3) of CCR 2004. The appeal was rejected, affirming the lower authorities' decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377688