https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377687 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax under the Business Auxiliary Service category for the port handling and terminal handling charges collected on behalf of their principal. The judgment clarified the distinction between expenses collected as agents and remuneration for services rendered, ultimately setting aside the demand for service tax. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377687 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax under the Business Auxiliary Service category for the port handling and terminal handling charges collected on behalf of their principal. The judgment clarified the distinction between expenses collected as agents and remuneration for services rendered, ultimately setting aside the demand for service tax. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377687