https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377677 The Tribunal upheld the appellant's contentions on the issues related to CVD paid using DEPB scripts and the clearance of waste and scrap of capital goods up to October 2008. The demand on these counts was set aside based on legal precedents and the absence of specific provisions. However, the Tribunal confirmed the demand for Cenvat credit in respect of Goods Transport Agency services beyond the place of removal after March 2008. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of the demand by the Adjudicating Authority. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Apr 2019 07:28:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377677 The Tribunal upheld the appellant's contentions on the issues related to CVD paid using DEPB scripts and the clearance of waste and scrap of capital goods up to October 2008. The demand on these counts was set aside based on legal precedents and the absence of specific provisions. However, the Tribunal confirmed the demand for Cenvat credit in respect of Goods Transport Agency services beyond the place of removal after March 2008. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of the demand by the Adjudicating Authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377677