<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 119 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the original authority to re-adjudicate the matter within the parameters of the related SCN. The original authority was instructed to consider relevant case laws and contentions of the appellants in their reply to the SCN to reach a decision on the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 07:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 119 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the original authority to re-adjudicate the matter within the parameters of the related SCN. The original authority was instructed to consider relevant case laws and contentions of the appellants in their reply to the SCN to reach a decision on the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>