<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 115 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377671</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found jurisdictional errors in both the High Court&#039;s decision to award punishment and compensation and the Appellate Court&#039;s decision to remand the case. The Supreme Court set aside these orders and directed the Appellate Court to decide the appeal afresh within six months, based on the material already on record and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 07:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 115 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377671</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found jurisdictional errors in both the High Court&#039;s decision to award punishment and compensation and the Appellate Court&#039;s decision to remand the case. The Supreme Court set aside these orders and directed the Appellate Court to decide the appeal afresh within six months, based on the material already on record and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>