<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 98 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalties for both Assessment Years 2001-02 and 2002-03, emphasizing complete disclosure and the debatable nature of the issues, precluding penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals were allowed, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between bona fide claims and concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars to avoid penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 98 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalties for both Assessment Years 2001-02 and 2002-03, emphasizing complete disclosure and the debatable nature of the issues, precluding penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals were allowed, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between bona fide claims and concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars to avoid penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>