<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 87 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377643</link>
    <description>The court quashed the decisions of the Appellate Committee and the Policy Relaxation Committee, directing the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to amend the Advance Authorisations by substituting the name and IEC number of the petitioner and extending the export obligation period by six months. The authorities&#039; refusal to make these amendments was deemed arbitrary and contrary to relevant provisions and Circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 87 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377643</link>
      <description>The court quashed the decisions of the Appellate Committee and the Policy Relaxation Committee, directing the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to amend the Advance Authorisations by substituting the name and IEC number of the petitioner and extending the export obligation period by six months. The authorities&#039; refusal to make these amendments was deemed arbitrary and contrary to relevant provisions and Circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>