<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377637</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order adding undisclosed income on excess stock of jewellery for the assessment year 1998-99, as the Tribunal failed to justify the addition of Rs. 3,00,000 without proper basis or concession from the Assessee. The Court restored the CIT (Appeals) order, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s lack of proper fact-finding and reasoning. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 07:15:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377637</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order adding undisclosed income on excess stock of jewellery for the assessment year 1998-99, as the Tribunal failed to justify the addition of Rs. 3,00,000 without proper basis or concession from the Assessee. The Court restored the CIT (Appeals) order, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s lack of proper fact-finding and reasoning. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>