https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377624 The High Court ordered the release of the petitioner's goods and vehicle seized due to a discrepancy in dates on the tax invoice and E-WAY bill. The petitioner was required to provide security equivalent to the amount mentioned in Section 129(1)(a) of the Act. The seizure was considered hyper-technical and not valid grounds for seizure. (M/s Ramdev Trading Company vs. State of U.P. et al., 2017) en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377624 The High Court ordered the release of the petitioner's goods and vehicle seized due to a discrepancy in dates on the tax invoice and E-WAY bill. The petitioner was required to provide security equivalent to the amount mentioned in Section 129(1)(a) of the Act. The seizure was considered hyper-technical and not valid grounds for seizure. (M/s Ramdev Trading Company vs. State of U.P. et al., 2017) Case-Laws GST Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377624