<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 63 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377619</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2098.25 crores made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that all requirements of Section 68 were met, establishing the genuineness of the transaction where preference shares were issued to a foreign investor. Despite initial suspicions, detailed inquiries confirmed the legitimacy of the investment, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 63 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377619</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2098.25 crores made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that all requirements of Section 68 were met, establishing the genuineness of the transaction where preference shares were issued to a foreign investor. Despite initial suspicions, detailed inquiries confirmed the legitimacy of the investment, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>