<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 49 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377605</link>
    <description>The appeal in ITA No. 6002/Mum/2017 was dismissed due to a delay of 2119 days in filing. However, the appeal in ITA No. 6001/Mum/2017 was allowed for statistical purposes, with the penalty issue remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication. The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for non-deduction of TDS was set aside, and the case was directed back to the AO for re-examination based on the explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 49 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377605</link>
      <description>The appeal in ITA No. 6002/Mum/2017 was dismissed due to a delay of 2119 days in filing. However, the appeal in ITA No. 6001/Mum/2017 was allowed for statistical purposes, with the penalty issue remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication. The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for non-deduction of TDS was set aside, and the case was directed back to the AO for re-examination based on the explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>