<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 41 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377597</link>
    <description>Demurrage charges paid to an airport cargo handler were not refundable as a matter of right where detention arose from a customs dispute over assessable value and the importer had itself contested duty liability. The governing waiver policy barred relief in such circumstances, and judicial review would not interfere unless the refusal of waiver was arbitrary, unreasonable, or contrary to policy. On that basis, the refusal to waive or return the demurrage was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 41 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377597</link>
      <description>Demurrage charges paid to an airport cargo handler were not refundable as a matter of right where detention arose from a customs dispute over assessable value and the importer had itself contested duty liability. The governing waiver policy barred relief in such circumstances, and judicial review would not interfere unless the refusal of waiver was arbitrary, unreasonable, or contrary to policy. On that basis, the refusal to waive or return the demurrage was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>