<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 40 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation order of the Customs Broker Licence due to the violation of the prescribed time limit for issuance. The decision emphasized the mandatory nature of time limits as per legal precedents and found that discrepancies in client authorization or importer verification were insufficient grounds for revocation. The appeal was allowed, and the revocation order was deemed unsustainable, granting consequential benefits to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:34:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 40 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation order of the Customs Broker Licence due to the violation of the prescribed time limit for issuance. The decision emphasized the mandatory nature of time limits as per legal precedents and found that discrepancies in client authorization or importer verification were insufficient grounds for revocation. The appeal was allowed, and the revocation order was deemed unsustainable, granting consequential benefits to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>