<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 38 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was no willful misstatement or suppression of facts. However, the penalty under Section 114AA was reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs due to the lapse in declaring the relationship with the exporter. The appeal was disposed of based on these findings, with the appellant&#039;s prompt rectification of the discrepancy being a key factor in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 38 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was no willful misstatement or suppression of facts. However, the penalty under Section 114AA was reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs due to the lapse in declaring the relationship with the exporter. The appeal was disposed of based on these findings, with the appellant&#039;s prompt rectification of the discrepancy being a key factor in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>