<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 36 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377592</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the National Company Law Tribunal as the scheme of arrangement, seeking to merge multiple companies, was found to be non-compliant with Reserve Bank of India (RBI) regulations. The Regional Director&#039;s concerns about the companies engaging in non-banking financial company (NBFC) activities without proper approvals were pivotal in the rejection. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments based on an RBI circular, the lack of clarity on the companies&#039; financial activities and the absence of the Regional Director&#039;s appearance led to the Tribunal upholding the rejection, underscoring the significance of regulatory compliance in corporate transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:34:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 36 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377592</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the National Company Law Tribunal as the scheme of arrangement, seeking to merge multiple companies, was found to be non-compliant with Reserve Bank of India (RBI) regulations. The Regional Director&#039;s concerns about the companies engaging in non-banking financial company (NBFC) activities without proper approvals were pivotal in the rejection. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments based on an RBI circular, the lack of clarity on the companies&#039; financial activities and the absence of the Regional Director&#039;s appearance led to the Tribunal upholding the rejection, underscoring the significance of regulatory compliance in corporate transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>