https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377590 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the order confirming the retention of seized documents, and directed the respondent to return the documents to the appellant. The Tribunal found that the retention was invalid due to non-compliance with procedural requirements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and emphasized that the proceedings constituted an abuse of process. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:34:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377590 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the order confirming the retention of seized documents, and directed the respondent to return the documents to the appellant. The Tribunal found that the retention was invalid due to non-compliance with procedural requirements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and emphasized that the proceedings constituted an abuse of process. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377590