https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377576 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant concerning the appropriation of sanctioned rebate claims against outstanding dues. The Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected the appeals due to a lack of stay order from the Tribunal. However, it was found that the Tribunal had granted an extension of stay until final disposal of the appeals. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had contested the adjudged demand successfully before appellate forums. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting the appellant the consequential benefit of the rebate claim. en-us Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377576 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant concerning the appropriation of sanctioned rebate claims against outstanding dues. The Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected the appeals due to a lack of stay order from the Tribunal. However, it was found that the Tribunal had granted an extension of stay until final disposal of the appeals. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had contested the adjudged demand successfully before appellate forums. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting the appellant the consequential benefit of the rebate claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377576