<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 16 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the ROM application seeking rectification of an error in the final order by including Order-in-Original No.06/2011 in the cause title. The error was acknowledged as apparent, leading to the modification of the impugned order to rectify the omission. The judgment underscores the significance of accuracy and clarity in legal documentation, emphasizing the procedural correction of mistakes to maintain the integrity of the legal record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 07:49:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 16 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the ROM application seeking rectification of an error in the final order by including Order-in-Original No.06/2011 in the cause title. The error was acknowledged as apparent, leading to the modification of the impugned order to rectify the omission. The judgment underscores the significance of accuracy and clarity in legal documentation, emphasizing the procedural correction of mistakes to maintain the integrity of the legal record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>