<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377560</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the revision and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a detailed examination of payments made by the assessee through banking channels, emphasizing the importance of proper findings in tax disputes. The Court criticized the lower authorities for not considering transactions through banking channels and rejected the argument of the dealer being a sham firm, as the registration was cancelled by the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 06:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377560</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the revision and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a detailed examination of payments made by the assessee through banking channels, emphasizing the importance of proper findings in tax disputes. The Court criticized the lower authorities for not considering transactions through banking channels and rejected the argument of the dealer being a sham firm, as the registration was cancelled by the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>