https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279682 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed against the Order-in-Appeal confirming the demand of Service Tax for a specific period. The appellant's contention of non-liability for Service Tax was rejected, as their awareness of the tax was evident by their registration application. While penalties under Section 78 were upheld, other penalties were set aside. The Tribunal extended the benefit under Section 80 of the Act regarding penalties under Section 78, deeming them excessive. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279682 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed against the Order-in-Appeal confirming the demand of Service Tax for a specific period. The appellant's contention of non-liability for Service Tax was rejected, as their awareness of the tax was evident by their registration application. While penalties under Section 78 were upheld, other penalties were set aside. The Tribunal extended the benefit under Section 80 of the Act regarding penalties under Section 78, deeming them excessive. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279682