<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1442 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279680</link>
    <description>The Member (J) overturned the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to impose a penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, on an appellant for delayed interest payment related to service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The Member (J) held that the delay in interest payment did not demonstrate an intent to evade tax, ultimately allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal and upholding the adjudicating authority&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1442 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279680</link>
      <description>The Member (J) overturned the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to impose a penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, on an appellant for delayed interest payment related to service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The Member (J) held that the delay in interest payment did not demonstrate an intent to evade tax, ultimately allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal and upholding the adjudicating authority&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>