<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1652 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279689</link>
    <description>An intervening assessment year was treated consistently with an earlier Rajasthan HC ruling between the same parties, because the Revenue could not distinguish the issue from the prior batch decision on assessment years 2006-07 and 2008-09. Applying that earlier inter partes conclusion to assessment year 2007-08, the Court held that no different result was warranted and upheld the Rajasthan Tax Board&#039;s order. The writ petition was dismissed on the basis that the same legal question had already been decided between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 06:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1652 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279689</link>
      <description>An intervening assessment year was treated consistently with an earlier Rajasthan HC ruling between the same parties, because the Revenue could not distinguish the issue from the prior batch decision on assessment years 2006-07 and 2008-09. Applying that earlier inter partes conclusion to assessment year 2007-08, the Court held that no different result was warranted and upheld the Rajasthan Tax Board&#039;s order. The writ petition was dismissed on the basis that the same legal question had already been decided between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>