https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279673 Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 fixes limitation for an election petition by reference only to the date on which the Section 28(k) list is made available for sale or inspection. The Court held that other statutory events, including those in Sections 10 and 32, could not be imported into the limitation trigger. On the evidence, the list was available on 17.02.2012, so the ten-day period expired on 27.02.2012. The petition filed on 28.02.2012 was therefore time-barred, and no provision allowed condonation of delay. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Mar 2019 15:49:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279673 Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 fixes limitation for an election petition by reference only to the date on which the Section 28(k) list is made available for sale or inspection. The Court held that other statutory events, including those in Sections 10 and 32, could not be imported into the limitation trigger. On the evidence, the list was available on 17.02.2012, so the ten-day period expired on 27.02.2012. The petition filed on 28.02.2012 was therefore time-barred, and no provision allowed condonation of delay. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279673