<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1574 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377553</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of cash payments under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the appellant failed to meet the conditions specified in Rule 6DD(j) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Despite claiming commercial expediency, the appellant could not substantiate circumstances warranting an exception under the rule. The court found no grounds for exemption and dismissed the appeal without costs, as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 09:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1574 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377553</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of cash payments under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the appellant failed to meet the conditions specified in Rule 6DD(j) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Despite claiming commercial expediency, the appellant could not substantiate circumstances warranting an exception under the rule. The court found no grounds for exemption and dismissed the appeal without costs, as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>