<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1547 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377526</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the appellant&#039;s lease of premises, computers, and machinery from its sister concern constituted a transfer, thus disallowing the deduction under Section 10B(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s undertaking was not genuinely new and that the transfer of assets did not qualify for the exemption. The appeal was dismissed, and the revenue&#039;s position was favored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1547 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377526</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the appellant&#039;s lease of premises, computers, and machinery from its sister concern constituted a transfer, thus disallowing the deduction under Section 10B(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s undertaking was not genuinely new and that the transfer of assets did not qualify for the exemption. The appeal was dismissed, and the revenue&#039;s position was favored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>