<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1541 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals against penalty orders under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision favored the assessee on issues related to the characterization of revenue from embedded software, taxability of income from software supply, and deletion of penalties by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Emphasizing the principle that penalties cannot be imposed when two views are possible on tax matters, the Tribunal upheld previous decisions in favor of the assessee. The judgment highlighted the importance of consistency in tax treatment and considering multiple views before penalizing taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1541 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals against penalty orders under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision favored the assessee on issues related to the characterization of revenue from embedded software, taxability of income from software supply, and deletion of penalties by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Emphasizing the principle that penalties cannot be imposed when two views are possible on tax matters, the Tribunal upheld previous decisions in favor of the assessee. The judgment highlighted the importance of consistency in tax treatment and considering multiple views before penalizing taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>