<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1540 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 2,50,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, emphasizing the Assessee&#039;s failure to substantiate the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The Tribunal also confirmed the addition of Rs. 12,500 as commission paid, ruling in favor of the AO&#039;s estimation. The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming all additions made by the AO and CIT(A) due to insufficient evidence provided. The order was issued on 25-03-2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1540 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 2,50,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, emphasizing the Assessee&#039;s failure to substantiate the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The Tribunal also confirmed the addition of Rs. 12,500 as commission paid, ruling in favor of the AO&#039;s estimation. The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming all additions made by the AO and CIT(A) due to insufficient evidence provided. The order was issued on 25-03-2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>