<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1531 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377510</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by confirming a penalty of 50,000 for the appellant, a customs broker, accused of subletting their license and failing to verify exporters&#039; antecedents. Despite evidence supporting subletting, inconsistencies in statements led to the benefit of doubt for the appellant. The tribunal upheld penalties and license revocation for violations but restored the license upon payment of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1531 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377510</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by confirming a penalty of 50,000 for the appellant, a customs broker, accused of subletting their license and failing to verify exporters&#039; antecedents. Despite evidence supporting subletting, inconsistencies in statements led to the benefit of doubt for the appellant. The tribunal upheld penalties and license revocation for violations but restored the license upon payment of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>