<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1525 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377504</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that &quot;Iron Ore Concentrates&quot; should be classified as &quot;Iron Ore&quot; for exemption eligibility under Notification No. 62/2007-Customs. It held that the exemption covers &quot;Iron Ore Concentrates&quot; meeting specified criteria, emphasizing that procedural errors should not preclude exemption entitlement. The decision granted the appeal with associated relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1525 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377504</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that &quot;Iron Ore Concentrates&quot; should be classified as &quot;Iron Ore&quot; for exemption eligibility under Notification No. 62/2007-Customs. It held that the exemption covers &quot;Iron Ore Concentrates&quot; meeting specified criteria, emphasizing that procedural errors should not preclude exemption entitlement. The decision granted the appeal with associated relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>