<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1522 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377501</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal condoned a 3-day delay in appealing the order admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the Operational Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found the appeal by the Corporate Debtor not maintainable due to the appointment of an insolvency professional, following the precedent set in &quot;Innoventive Industries Limited&quot; by the Supreme Court. Despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s willingness to settle, the Tribunal clarified that the impugned order could not be set aside, allowing other parties to seek relief before the Committee of Creditors under Section 12 A of the I&amp;amp;B Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1522 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377501</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal condoned a 3-day delay in appealing the order admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the Operational Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found the appeal by the Corporate Debtor not maintainable due to the appointment of an insolvency professional, following the precedent set in &quot;Innoventive Industries Limited&quot; by the Supreme Court. Despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s willingness to settle, the Tribunal clarified that the impugned order could not be set aside, allowing other parties to seek relief before the Committee of Creditors under Section 12 A of the I&amp;amp;B Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>