<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1520 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377499</link>
    <description>The Operational Creditor filed a Company Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting in payment. The Corporate Debtor did not dispute the outstanding amount claimed in the Demand Notice, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and issuance of a moratorium order. The Tribunal admitted the petition for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, ensuring continuity of essential services and specifying the moratorium period until resolution completion. The judgment emphasized the need for genuine disputes and rejected the Corporate Debtor&#039;s post-demand notice dispute as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1520 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377499</link>
      <description>The Operational Creditor filed a Company Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting in payment. The Corporate Debtor did not dispute the outstanding amount claimed in the Demand Notice, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and issuance of a moratorium order. The Tribunal admitted the petition for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, ensuring continuity of essential services and specifying the moratorium period until resolution completion. The judgment emphasized the need for genuine disputes and rejected the Corporate Debtor&#039;s post-demand notice dispute as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>