https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377493 The earlier order was found to contain an apparent mistake because it did not examine the applicability of Section 65(105)(zx) of the Finance Act, 1994, even though the show cause notice had raised that allegation alongside Section 65(105)(zzzzf). That omission justified rectification, and the miscellaneous application was allowed. The matter was then listed for final hearing. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:10:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377493 The earlier order was found to contain an apparent mistake because it did not examine the applicability of Section 65(105)(zx) of the Finance Act, 1994, even though the show cause notice had raised that allegation alongside Section 65(105)(zzzzf). That omission justified rectification, and the miscellaneous application was allowed. The matter was then listed for final hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377493