<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1495 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377474</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the broad interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; for lease rentals and operation and maintenance charges of wind mills situated outside the factory. Citing decisions from the High Courts of Madras and Bombay, it held that services used directly or indirectly in manufacturing final products qualify as input services, regardless of location. Dismissing Revenue appeals, the Tribunal aligned with the courts&#039; expansive view, emphasizing the relevance of these precedents in determining eligibility for input service credit. The Counter Objections filed by the respondent were also disposed of, underscoring the importance of the inclusive definition of &quot;input service&quot; in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:57:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1495 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377474</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the broad interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; for lease rentals and operation and maintenance charges of wind mills situated outside the factory. Citing decisions from the High Courts of Madras and Bombay, it held that services used directly or indirectly in manufacturing final products qualify as input services, regardless of location. Dismissing Revenue appeals, the Tribunal aligned with the courts&#039; expansive view, emphasizing the relevance of these precedents in determining eligibility for input service credit. The Counter Objections filed by the respondent were also disposed of, underscoring the importance of the inclusive definition of &quot;input service&quot; in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>