<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1493 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal filed by the appellant with consequential relief. The demand against the appellant for erroneous refund was deemed unsustainable due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations that the appellant was not a manufacturer. The show cause notice was based on assumptions without substantiating evidence, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1493 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal filed by the appellant with consequential relief. The demand against the appellant for erroneous refund was deemed unsustainable due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations that the appellant was not a manufacturer. The show cause notice was based on assumptions without substantiating evidence, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>