https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377471 The Tribunal set aside the orders against the appellants, ruling that the investigation lacked concrete evidence and was based on assumptions. It recognized the manufacturing activities of the appellants in J&K and upheld their entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-CE. Consequently, the demands for duty and penalties, as well as the denial of Cenvat credit, were deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:55:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377471 The Tribunal set aside the orders against the appellants, ruling that the investigation lacked concrete evidence and was based on assumptions. It recognized the manufacturing activities of the appellants in J&K and upheld their entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-CE. Consequently, the demands for duty and penalties, as well as the denial of Cenvat credit, were deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377471